Hitherto we have focussed on improving our own game. Now is the time to turn the concept on its head and critique the play of others. Bwahhahahahahahaahahah 😊
If you’ve ever tried to improve at Spider Solitaire, no doubt at some point in your life you attempted to google search videos of other players plying their wares and (preferably) winning at the end. You probably also noticed that not everyone can reach the lofty heights of GM Jan Gustafsson killing it in Banter Blitz, crushing various chess players online while simultaneously trash-talking about irrelevant TV shows and what-not. I’m sure there are decent Spider Solitaire players out there, but that obviously doesn’t imply they know how to make high-quality videos.
For the following questions we will use the following six-point scale:
On a scale of 1 to rot13(ohyyfuvg) how would you rate
- The difficulty of the hand (1 = hardest)
- The strength of the player (1 = strongest)
- The quality of presentation (1 = best)
- Overall score (1 = best)
IMPORTANT: Do not attempt to justify your answers. This is intended as material for future blog posts. In other words, Now Me doesn’t wanna steal the thunder from Future Me.
Search for other videos of someone winning at the four-suit level without rot13(haqb). To avoid confusion the following requirements are specified:
- Must be four suits
- No rot13(haqb) – except for correcting obvious mouse-slips that don’t reveal face-down cards by accident.
- Must win – no glory for a near miss, even if the hand is ridic difficult 😊
- The complete game-play must be shown (e.g. no skipping the boring bits)
- Do not play more than one hand.
- A video is not DQ’ed for lame music, terrible jokes, swearing at every bad card or clumsy attempts at rick-rolling.
Answer the same four questions in Part I. If you found multiple videos, answer these questions for at most two videos with highest overall score only. Again, do not attempt to justify your answers.
FUN FACT: a bonne is a French term for nursemaid or housemaid.